The second is that a practice of defense in depth is a sound policy to follow. The first is that it fundamentally works differently than uBlock Origin. Why is Privacy Badger on this list when the previous item may seem similar? A couple reasons. "Privacy Badger was born out of our desire to be able to recommend a single extension that would automatically analyze and block any tracker or ad that violated the principle of user consent which could function well without any settings, knowledge, or configuration by the user which is produced by an organization that is unambiguously working for its users rather than for advertisers and which uses algorithmic methods to decide what is and isn't tracking." It's a project of the Electronic Freedom Foundation, which says: As the name indicates, Privacy Badger is a privacy-focused extension that blocks ads and other third-party trackers. If anything, privacy has been brought even more to the forefront since my previous article, making this extension an easy recommendation. My second recommendation also remains unchanged. It continues to be updated regularly and is one of the best options available for this functionality. Despite being powerful, the extension has proven to be efficient and performant. From there it allows you to arbitrarily add lists and rules, or even lock down to a default-deny mode. The default behavior of uBlock Origin is to block ads, trackers, and malware sites using multiple, predefined filter lists. uBlock Origin is a fast, low memory, wide-spectrum blocker that allows you to not only block ads but also enforce your own content filtering. My first recommendation remains unchanged. With that in mind, here are four open source Firefox extensions you may want to consider. Keep in mind you can use profiles to manage how an extension impacts your attack surface-for example, using a dedicated profile with no extensions to perform tasks such as online banking. That doesn't mean every extension will surreptitiously do these things, but you should carefully consider the installation source, the permissions involved, your risk profile, and other factors before you install any extension. If an extension has modify access to all the web pages you visit, it could act as a keylogger, intercept credit card information, track you online, insert advertisements, and perform a variety of other nefarious activities. You should consider the ramifications of this very carefully. Once again, I'd like to point out that browser extensions often require the ability to read and/or change everything on the web pages you visit. Additionally, that article received a ton of feedback that has been taken into account for this update. Since that article was published, one extension I recommended (Xmarks) has been discontinued. In the first article, I asked readers: "Which extensions should you install?" To reiterate, that decision largely comes down to how you use your browser, your views on privacy, how much you trust extension developers, and other personal preferences. Extensions for Firefox are built using the WebExtensions API, a cross-browser development system. Modern browsers have evolved into powerful and extensible platforms, and extensions can add or modify their functionality. Welcome to the communityĪs I mentioned in my original article on Firefox extensions, the web browser has become a critical component of the computing experience for many users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |